Legal Opinion
Stump v. Crawford & Co.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided November 28, 1989No. Civ. F 88-241PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM C. LEE, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment and motion to strike portions of plaintiffs’ submitted affidavits. Oral arguments were heard on September 11, 1989. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be denied and defendants’ motion to strike will be denied in part and deemed to be moot in part.
Summary Judgment
Summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edward R. POSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SKYLINE CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Darrell L. Valentine v. Joliet Township High School District No. 204Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stump v. Commercial UnionIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Buote v. Verizon New EnglandDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2002
- Rayford v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993