Legal Opinion

Thornton v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 18, 1940No. 28475PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

The bill of exceptions recites, among other things, that “within the time prescribed by law the plaintiff in error presents this bill of exceptions,” and there is nothing in the record to contradict this recital, as appeared in the records in Shuman v. State, 50 Ga. App. 213 (177 S. E. 355), Hodnett v. State, 59 Ga. App. 908 (2 S. E. 2d, 749), Howard v. State, 60 Ga. App. 229 (4 S. E. 2d, 418), and Heaton v. State, 60 Ga. App. 428 (4 S. E. 2d, 98). The motion to dismiss the writ of error on the ground that the bill of exceptions was not tendered within twenty days, the time prescribed by law,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sweat v. BarnhillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. Hateley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. McCard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. TulloSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  2. Lancaster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API