Lancaster v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the indictment for the reasons, as the defendant contends, that the words, “wilful or wanton” disregard of the safety of persons or property as contained in the statute, and the accusation based on the provisions of the statute are not so vague, indefinite, and uncertain in terms as to be incapable of enforcement. The words “wilful or wanton” in both our civil and criminal statutes and decisions, have a well established, clear and definite meaning under our legal jurisprudence. We might pause here to mention some of them. We will cite a…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Southern Railway Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Blanchard v. OgletreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- King v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McKay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- State v. EarlenbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- State v. AshtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.