Legal Opinion

Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. United States

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided July 2, 1970No. 69 C 378PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

REGAN, District Judge.

This is an action to review and set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission which required Norfolk and Western Railway Company (N & W) to continue the operation of its passenger trains Nos. 301 and 304 (the “Wabash Cannonball”) between St. Louis and Detroit for one year following the date of the order issued June 26, 1969. The Commission’s decision is reported in Norfolk & Western Railway Co. Discontinuance of Trains Nos. 301 and 304, 3341.C.C. 506.

Norfolk and Western duly filed notice of its discontinuance of trains Nos. 301 and 304…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. City of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Herrin Transp. Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. T.S.C. Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1960
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beaufort Transfer Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1971
  2. Slay Transportation Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API