Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sevayega v. Reis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2000No. Nos. 99-2251 and 99-2252PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgments of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its opinions. As we have consistently and unanimously held, appellees *459do not have a clear legal duty under R.C. 149.43 to transmit copies of requested records by mail or other means. See, e.g., State ex rel. Porter v. Cleveland Dept. of Pub. Safety (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 258, 259, 703 N.E.2d 308, 309; State ex rel. Warren v. Warner (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 432, 433, 704 N.E.2d 1228, 1229; State ex rel. Iacovone v. Kaminski (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 189, 190, 690 N.E.2d 4, 5; State ex rel. Mayes v. Holman (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Plain Dealer v. Ohio Dept. of InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Mayes v. HolmanOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Warren v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State ex rel. Iacovone v. KaminskiOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Russell v. ThorntonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Sawyer v. Cuyahoga County Department of Children & Family ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. Roberts, 2007-Ca-33 (6-24-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State Ex Rel. May v. Lake Cty. Prosecutor, 2006-L-251 (6-8-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State ex rel. Sevayega v. ReisOhio Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API