State Ex Rel. May v. Lake Cty. Prosecutor, 2006-L-251 (6-8-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM OPINION
{¶ 1} This action in mandamus is presently before this court for consideration of the motion to dismiss of respondent, Lake County Prosecutor Charles Coulson. As the primary basis for his motion, respondent submits that the petition of relator, James May, fails to state a viable claim for a writ because his own allegations establish that he has not taken the necessary steps to qualify for the requested relief. For the reasons which follow, we conclude that the motion to dismiss is well taken.
{¶ 2} Relator is presently incarcerated at the Lake Erie Correctional Institution,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Russell v. ThorntonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Sevayega v. ReisOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Sevayega v. ReisOhio Supreme Court · 2000
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hall v. State, 2008-T-0073 (1-30-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009