Legal Opinion
State, Department of Human Services Ex Rel. Parker v. Irizarry
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided May 25, 1995No. 930583-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION1
BENCH, Judge:
The Department of Social Services of the State of Utah (the State), on behalf of Cathy Parker, appeals the trial court’s application of the doctrine of equitable estoppel .to prevent Ms. Parker’s recovery of reimbursement for past child support from Harry Irizarry. We affirm.
FACTS
In June 1984, Ms. Parker and Mr. Irizarry met and began dating. Shortly thereafter, Ms. Parker became pregnant. After discovering she was pregnant, Ms. Parker temporarily moved from Utah to California. That August, Mr. Irizarry visited Ms. Parker in California and learned that she was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Baggs v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1974
- Trolley Square Associates v. NielsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- BORLAND BY DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERV. v. ChandlerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Brixen & Christopher, Architects v. EltonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State, Department of Human Services Ex Rel. Parker v. IrizarryUtah Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re the Support Obligation of LoomisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re the Support Obligation of LoomisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State, Department of Human Services Ex Rel. Parker v. IrizarryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
- State, Department of Human Services Ex Rel. Parker v. IrizarryUtah Supreme Court · 1997