Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Support Obligation of Loomis

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1998No. NonePublished

1DissentKonenkamp, Justice

[¶ 29.] How can we take the “child” out of child support? Today this Court penalizes a child for the behavior of her parents. Fourteen years ago through irresponsible sexual relations, David and Linda brought a child into the world. That David was notified only recently makes Kristie no less his daughter and he no less her father. If her mother was dilatory, Kristie still has a right to back support from her father, just as she had the right to be supported by her mother over those same years. In the climate of bitter disputes, we must keep in mind the object of child support. It is neither…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Clark v. JeterSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Peterson v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Billion v. BillionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Golden v. Oahe Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Armour v. AllenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API