Legal Opinion
MBL (USA) Corp. v. Diekman
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided September 17, 1985No. 84-2826PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bilandic
Appellants Frederick J. Diekman, FBN Industries, and Surface Additions, Inc. (hereinafter referred to collectively as Diekman), appeal from an order of the circuit court that dismissed their amended counterclaim with prejudice. The amended counterclaim alleged that appellees MBL (USA) Corp. (hereinafter MBL), Chemi-Flex, Inc., and Ernest Meeder conspired to monopolize the urethane timing belt market in Illinois in violation of the Illinois Antitrust Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 38, par. 60 — 1 et seq.). After appellees moved to dismiss the amended counterclaim under sections 2 — 615 and 2 —…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Janes v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- People Ex Rel. Fahner v. Carriage Way West, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Bowman v. County of LakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
- People Ex Rel. Scott v. College Hills Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- W. P. Iverson & Co. v. Dunham Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Talbert v. Home Sav. of America, FAAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Senese v. Climatemp, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Bank of Northern Illinois v. NugentAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Stefani v. Baird & Warner, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Anthony v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.