Legal Opinion
Anthony v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided March 29, 1988No. 87-2905PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE HARTMAN
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiff, Mark Anthony, claims error in the dismissal of his second amended complaint with prejudice for failure to state a cause of action against the City of Chicago (City), the Chicago Fire Department (Department) and an unknown city fireman. For reasons which follow, we reverse and remand.
Following previous dismissals of earlier complaints, on April 9, 1987, Anthony filed a three-count, second amended complaint pursuant to leave of court. Count I, in relevant part, asserted defendants’ negligence in that they permitted Anthony…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Curtis v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Huey v. the Town of CiceroIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Gardner v. Village of Chicago RidgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- Marvin v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Bell v. Village of MidlothianAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Doe v. Calumet CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Burdinie v. Village of Glendale HeightsIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Calloway v. KinkelaarIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Leone v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- Thames v. Board of Educ. of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.