Crowell v. Gould
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Associate Justice.
Appellants, appearing jointly, filed a bill seeking specific performance of three agreements, two of which were executed by appellee and appellant Crowell, and the third by appellee and appellant Alderman. One of the former agreements, in turn, incorporated by reference three communications theretofore written by appellee to appellant Crowell, and in terms provided: “this instrument is to be construed in the light of the three communications. * * * ” These six writings related to a device called an “Electric-eye project,” invented by appellee, and for which an…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Hunt v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Pope Manufacturing Co. v. GormullySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Colson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Flack v. LasterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- American Federation of Labor v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- H. Max Ammerman v. City Stores CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- City Stores Company v. AmmermanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
- Hodges v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.