Legal Opinion
H. Max Ammerman v. City Stores Company
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 4, 1968No. 21097_1PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants, builders and developers of Tyson’s Corner Shopping Center in Fairfax County, Virginia, 1 challenge the District Court’s decision (1) that the builders had given City Stores Company, owners of Lansburgh’s Department Store, a binding option to lease one of the major buildings to be constructed at the contemplated shopping center and (2) that the option-lease agreement is sufficiently definite and certain in terms of design, type of construction, and price to be specifically enforced. 2
The appellants in their statement of points have here contended that the District Court erred: in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Muschany v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Hazelton v. SheckellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Valdes v. LarrinagaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- 1010 Potomac Associates v. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Dyer v. BilaalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- EastBanc, Inc. v. Georgetown Park Associates II, L.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,263 Frank S. Yamamoto, Individually And, Derivatively, on Behalf of Investors Finance, Inc. v. Kazuo OmiyaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Mid-Continent Telephone Corp. v. Home Telephone Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1970
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.