Legal Opinion
Tap Electrical Contracting Service, Inc. v. Hartnett
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 5, 1990PublishedCited by 12 opinions
POINTS OF COUNSEL
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The only argument preserved for our review in these cross-appeals is whether the holding in Matter of Monarch Elec. Contr. Corp. v Roberts (70 NY2d 91) applies to construction projects jointly funded by the State and Federal governments under the Federal-Aid Highway Act (23 USC § 101 et seq. [FAHA]).
In Monarch we reviewed the history and interpretation of Labor Law § 220 and held that it requires the classification of all employees on State-funded public work projects as either journeymen or apprentices and that to qualify as an apprentice under the statute an employee…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Binghamton Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Monarch Electrical Contracting Corp. v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- MATTER OF HULL-HAZARD, INC. v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Green Island Construction Co. v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- Cox v. NAP Constr. Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Fermenta ASC Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1994
- Siera Telcom Services, Inc. v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Majstrovic v. R. Maric Piping, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1997
- NAB Construction Corp. v. GoldinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.