Legal Opinion
Young v. Margiotta
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 7, 1950PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiff, a lessee of certain premises, seeks in this action to recover claimed overcharges of rent under the federal Emergency Price Control Act of 1942; 56 Stat. 23, as amended, 50 U. S. C. App. § 901 et seq.; and under the Housing and Rent Act of 1947. 61 Stat. 193, as amended, 50 U. S. C. App. § 1881 et seq. (Sup. 2). The trial court gave judgment for the defendants and the plaintiff has appealed.
Previous to September 1, 1942, the Meriden Savings Bank owned a lot in Waterbury on which was a four-story building containing three stores and fifteen apartments. The apartments were…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Gardner v. CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Bowles v. Glick Bros. Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Louisville v. Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Consolidated Motor Lines, Inc. v. M & M Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Matheny v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Connecticut v. DoehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hogan v. ColemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Tralli v. Triple X Stores, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1954
- Seletsky v. RoyConnecticut Superior Court · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.