Legal Opinion

United States v. William Chippas

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 16, 1991No. 91-1062PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

William Chippas appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed under former Rule 35(a). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Chippas was convicted of distributing cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. On direct appeal, this court, in United States v. Padilla, 869 F.2d 372 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 909, 109 S.Ct. 3223, 106 L.Ed.2d 572 (1989), relying on United States v. Portillo, 863 F.2d 25, 26 (8th Cir.1988) (per curiam), vacated…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Gozlon-Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. William John BauerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. PrestonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Robert CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API