Legal Opinion

Goad v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 13, 1929No. A-6472PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Atoka county on a charge of having possession of intoxi- eating liquor, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and costs taxed at $32.20, and be imprisoned in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

Defendant for his first ground of error alleges: “The court erred in overruling the motion to disqualify the presiding judge in this cause.” When the case was called for trial, the defendant filed the following affidavit:

“Affidavit to Disqualify Judge.
“Comes now the defendant Arthur Goad, and respectfully…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People of the State of N.Y. v. . DohringNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  3. Gray v. CrockettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  4. Maitland v. ZangaWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Palmer v. NoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pitman v. DotySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. State Ex Rel. Hall v. NiewoehnerMontana Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State Ex Rel. Smith v. WilcoxenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API