Legal Opinion

Maitland v. Zanga

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1896No. 2037PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Snohomish County.— Hon. John C. Denney, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

This is an action for damages, founded *93on an agreement to convey land; at least, we construe the contract to be an agreement to convey. The contract was executed on August 5,1886. On November 26, 1889, something more than four years after the execution of the contract, the respondent, by warranty deed, conveyed said lands to one Roswell Skeel, a third party and bona fide purchaser, which deed was duly recorded.

The answer alleges affirmatively that the contract was a gift to take effect at respondent’s death; alleges fraudulent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Doon v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Buchtel v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Sheldon v. PruessnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Willapoint Oysters, Inc. v. EwingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  3. Billy Joe Tyler v. Harold R. Swenson, Warden, Missouri State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  4. State v. BringgoldWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API