Legal Opinion

Harris v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Plaintiff was a step-daughter of John S. Smith, deceased. On November113, 1806, when plaintiff was about nine years of age, her mother married Mr. Smith, then a widower, and went to live with him. Bach of the parties had separate estates. The wife owned 80 acres of land and personal property where she had lived before her marriage to Mr. Smith, and hek husband owned 80 acres where he lived, and some considerable personal property, and another 40 acres of land. At the time of the marriage the husband had five sons and three daughters, all of whom lived at home, more or leBS, after the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woods v. AyresMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Bartholomew v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1822
  3. Clark v. CoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. St. Jude's Church v. Van DenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Miskiewicz v. SmolenskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Kirchgassner v. RodickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  3. Roup v. RoupMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. In Re Thompson's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Wolverine World Wide, Inc. v. Wolverine Canada, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API