Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Rigsby v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 13, 2015No. 14-60160PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge:

In April 2006, Plaintiffs Cori and Kerri Rigsby (hereinafter, “the Rigsbys” or “re-lators”) brought this qui tam action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. (“FCA”), claiming that State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”) submitted false claims to the United States government for payment on flood policies arising out of damage caused by Hurricane Katrina. 1 At trial, the Rigs-bys prevailed on a single bellwether false claim under the FCA. The district court subsequently denied their request to conduct further discovery, and denied State…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. United States Ex Rel. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. United States v. Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States Ex Rel. Bias v. Tangipahoa Parish School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  4. United States Ex Rel. Garbe v. Kmart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  5. International Brotherhood Elec v. Farfield CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API