Legal Opinion

R & R Associates v. City of Providence Water Supply Board

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 23, 2001No. 99-153-AppealPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLANDERS, Justice.

The fountainhead for deciding this case springs from the statutory and contractual origins of the Scituate Reservoir, a primary source of water for many Rhode Islanders. The Superior Court certified the plaintiffs, L & L Associates and its general partner, Robert LaFerriere, to represent a class of plaintiffs who constituted the “present-day successors in interest to the land and water rights that in 1922 were appurtenant to” nine separate mill sites that were owned by the Hope Company, B.B. & R. Knight, Inc., and Interlaken Mills (the mills). All of the mill sites…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commercial Union Insurance v. PelchatSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  2. Sorenson v. Colibri Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  3. D'Ambra v. North Providence School CommitteeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  4. Sullivan v. MarcelloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965
  5. Cardarelli v. Department of Employment & Training, Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alessi v. BOWEN COURT CONDOMINIUMSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  2. Ferreira v. Integon National InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  3. Fleet National Bank v. HuntSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  4. Tinney v. TinneySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  5. O'Brien v. ShermanSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API