Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. Schroeder

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1957No. 1983PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

This appeal presents the question whether there is any rule of law, statutory or otherwise, in this jurisdiction which prohibits the granting of a divorce on the uncorroborated testimony of the complainant in an uncontested action. The question has never been squarely decided, although there are a number of cases which imply that such a rule exists. Those cases make reference to our. statute now embodied in Code 1951, § 16-419, which provides:

“No decree for a divorce, or decree annulling a marriage, shall be rendered on default, without proof; nor shall any admission…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stone v. StoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  2. Tipping v. TippingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  3. Richardson v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  4. Buford v. BufordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  5. Hodges v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Davis v. JurneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Osborne v. OsborneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Moore v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Fortune v. FortuneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Snyder v. SnyderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API