Legal Opinion

Davis v. Jurney

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 1958No. 2162PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVER, Chief Judge.

Appellant, the natural mother of James Michael Harbin, filed a complaint in the Domestic Relations Branch seeking custody of her nine-year-old son from appellees, Elizabeth and John Jurney. At the conclusion of a lengthy hearing lasting several days, the trial judge entered an order awarding custody of the child to the Jur-neys. Assailing the court’s determination on several grounds appellant asks us to reverse this order.

Because of the nature of the case and the circumstances under which the Jurneys originally acquired custody of the child, the facts giving rise to this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Kropp v. ShepskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Boone v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  3. Louise Flood Bell v. Gwendolyn Hairston Leonard, Alonzo Bell and Louise Virginia Bell v. Gwendolyn Hairston LeonardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  4. Cooley v. WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Schroeder v. SchroederDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In re S.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Appeal of H.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. In re T.J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Montgomery County Department of Social Services v. SandersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. In re N. M. S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API