Legal Opinion
Osborne v. Osborne
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 30, 1957No. 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROVER, Chief Judge.
Appellant wife sued her husband for annulment of their marriage on the basis of (1) concealment of premarital nonchastity and (2) nondisclosure of his intention not to live with her as man and wife. The court dismissed the petition and this appeal followed.
The undisputed facts disclosed that immediately after the marriage in nearby Maryland, while the parties were returning to the District of Columbia where they supposedly were to live, the husband told appellant he had no place for her to live and that she would have to stay with her sister. He also informed her- that he…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Millar v. MillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Ridgely v. RidgelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
- Le Brun v. Le Brun ex rel. RandallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
- Brown v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
- Schroeder v. SchroederDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jett v. JettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Mitchell v. MitchellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Riedl v. RiedlDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
- Jwaideh v. JwaidehDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
- Fisher v. FisherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960