Cox v. Trousdale
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, J.:
This was an action to recover an attorney’s fee for professional services. Defendant prevailed, and plaintiff appeals.
The facts giving rise to this action may be summarized thus:
The late Thomas A. Noftzger, Esquire, was the head of a firm of lawyers in Wichita for a number of years and so continued until his death in 1931. The plaintiff George W. Cox became his partner in 1914. In 1919 the defendant Walter J. Trousdale became a client of the law firm of Noftzger & Cox. Trousdale had various business activities in which he required the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Dohner v. Winfield Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Trousdale v. AmermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Devlin v. City of PleasantonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Platts v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rogers v. Williams, Larson, Voss, Strobel & EstesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- Kirwin v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Manhardt v. Estate of SheridanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939