Legal Opinion

Trousdale v. Amerman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1927No. 27,637PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The action was one to recover for the conversion of certain bonds issued by the Arctic Ice and Refrigerating Company. Plaintiffs prevailed and defendants appeal.

Very briefly and in substance the facts are these: The Arctic

Ice and Refrigerating Company was in financial difficulties. Its stock was owned by the Trousdale family, including Lillian Trousdale Phillips, and Charles Phillips, one of the defendants. The com*615pany had outstanding the bonds in controversy, which were owned by the Trousdales. Phillips filed a schedule in bankruptcy for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brooks v. WeikSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Schroyer v. RuffheadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Grenola State Bank v. LynamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Arcadia Valley Fruit Growers' Ass'n v. Grovier-Starr Produce Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sluss v. Brown-Crummer Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Stagg v. StaggMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. of Mexico v. GonzalezArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Janiszewski v. BehrmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Andersen v. ThudeArizona Supreme Court · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API