Legal Opinion

McNeal v. Swain

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 19, 1991No. C9-90-2718PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of paternity and child support. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS

Appellant and respondent met in August 1986. At the paternity trial, respondent testified that she and appellant met several times and later developed a sexual relationship which lasted through October 1986. Respondent further testified that as a result of this sexual relationship, she became pregnant. Appellant testified that he saw respondent a few times and that he barely knew her. He denied being the father of her child.

The trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CotterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Nash v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Rieck v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. State v. StephonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. STATE ON BEHALF OF ELG v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rydberg v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Howie v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Martin v. ObiakorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API