Legal Opinion

Rieck v. Lambert

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1986No. C1-86-859PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

This is a parentage case that must be remanded for further findings of fact on the child support issue. Appellant also contends the trial court erred in awarding past support for 15 months between commencement of the action and the effective date of a temporary support order. We remand, but we reject appellant’s argument on past support.

FACTS

In October 1985, the trial court adjudicated that appellant Patrick Lambert was the parent of Andrew Rieck, then two and a half years old. The proceedings were commenced on April 12, 1984, but a temporary child support obligation was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Knopp v. GuttermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Hampton v. HamptonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rydberg v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. McNeal v. SwainCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Schaefer v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Isanti County Family Services & Welfare Department ex rel. Noren v. KunzaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Marriage of Kuchenmeister v. KuchenmeisterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API