Legal Opinion · Concurrence
In re the Marriage of Bushell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 28, 1993No. 90-0708; CA A72227Published
1ConcurrenceDurham, J.
I concur in the majority’s result. I write separately to express my disagreement with the majority’s use of the term “marital property.”
As the Supreme Court observed in Stice and Stice, 308 Or 316, 324, 779 P2d 1020 (1989):
“ORS 107.105(1)(f) contains two terms that describe classes of property. The first term, ‘the real or personal property, or both, of either or both of the parties,’ describes the entire class of property within the dispositional authority of the court in a dissolution case. See Pierson and Pierson, 294 Or 117, 121, 653 P2d 1258 (1982). * * * The term ‘real or personal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Marriage of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Matter of Marriage of SticeOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Matter of Marriage of RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Matter of Marriage of EngleOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In re BekooyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993