Hamdan v. Klimovitz
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtMarvin H. Smith, Judge
(Retired, Specially Assigned).
Appellant, Hassan Hamdan (Hamdan or appellant), a Harford County pawnbroker, contended unsuccessfully in the Circuit Court for Harford County that sections 188-3 and 188-4 of the Harford County Code were preempted by Title 12 of the Maryland Business Regulation Article. Section 188-3 *317requires “[ejvery pawnbroker doing business in the county” to submit to “the Sheriff of the County, a list of articles bought, traded or pledged” daily. Section 188-4 spells out in detail what must be included in that list. We would affirm but for the failure of the trial court to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State Insurance Commissioner v. National Bureau of Casualty UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Hunt v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- BOARD OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS OF PRICE GEORGE v. Oak Hill FarmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Turner v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Goodwich v. NolanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shipley v. MatlackCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001