Simmel v. Wilson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Townsend, J., Charleston. October 1921. Action by Louis C. Simmel, doing business- as Louis C. Simmel & Co., against H. G. and H. W. Wilson. From directed verdict for plaintiff, the defendant H. W. Wilson appeals. cites: Only evidence was as to dissolution and Court should have sd* held: 111 S. E., 14; 79 S. C., 338. Dissolution may he by. parol: 2 Rich.
Read the full summary
Before Townsend, J., Charleston. October 1921. Action by Louis C. Simmel, doing business- as Louis C. Simmel & Co., against H. G. and H. W. Wilson. From directed verdict for plaintiff, the defendant H. W. Wilson appeals. cites: Only evidence was as to dissolution and Court should have sd* held: 111 S. E., 14; 79 S. C., 338. Dissolution may he by. parol: 2 Rich. L.,- 351. Plaintiff extended no credit on strength of H. W, Wilson, had no knowledge of partnership, and not entitled to notice of dissolution: 13 S. E., 955; 54 N. W., 738; 30 S. W., 491; 10 Mich., 35; 24 Mo. App., 19; 153 N, W., 522.…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Marion.
Action by Louis C. Simmel, doing business as Louis C. Simmel & Co., plaintiff, against H. G. Wilson and H. W. Wilson, as co-partners under the firm name of Wilson & Wilson, defendants. From judgment on verdict for the plaintiff, directed by the Circuit Judge, the defendant H. W. Wilson appeals.
Stated from the standpoint of the appellant the evidence tended to establish the following facts: In March, 1917, H. G. Wilson and H. W. Wilson, defendant-appellant, formed a partnership to do a brokerage business in the City of Charleston, S.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Thompson v. First Nat. Bank of ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Austin v. ApplingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Solomon v. KirkwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Lovejoy v. SpaffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Price v. Middleton & RavenelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- B. F. Goodrich Rubber Co. v. BarronSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- B. F. Goodrich Rubber Co. v. BarronSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924