Legal Opinion · Dissent

B. F. Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Barron

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 9, 1924No. 11625Published

1Dissent

Mr. Justice Cothran:

I dissent from the conclusion ■of reversal announced in the opinion of Mr. Justice Fraser. I think that the order of Judge Shipp, rescinding his order directing a verdict in favor of the plaintiff against both defendants, was entirely proper, and shall endeavor to so demonstrate.

The action is upon an account for two truck tires, alleged to have been sold to the defendants Barron and Mobley, a partnership, under the name of B. & M. Motor Company; and the point in the case is whether one member of a partnership, which has been dissolved by mutual consent, and ceased to do…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Simmel v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API