Legal Opinion

Vignoli v. Mathies Coal Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 1977No. Appeal, No. 264 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

This appeal comes to us as the result of a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a referee’s denial of benefits to Philip Vignoli (Claimant).

On October 25, 1974, Claimant filed a claim petition alleging that he had become totally disabled due to his “exxposure [sic] to dusts while working in the coal mines” of Mathies Coal Company (Mathies) and as a result of the exposure, had incurred “anthracosilicosis and/or coal worker’s pneumoconiosis.” After hearings held on March 18 and May 6, 1975, the ref*3eree assigned to the case made the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. HartliebSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Riley Stoker Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. United Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. ZindashCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. E-C Apparatus Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Turner v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Gilbert v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Gilroy v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Liberty Baking Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. City of Altoona v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API