Legal Opinion

Tarrant v. Carrig

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 26, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This bill is filed to ascertain the dower of Sarah Carrig in premises situated at Springfield, New Jersey.

All parties consent to a sale of the property, so it will be decreed.

Certain facts were referred to a special master to take testimony and report. He has filed his report.

First, the age of the doweress. The master found Mrs. Carrig to be sixty-one years old. There is some dispute as to this, as Mrs. Carrig was born in Ireland, and it is, apparently, impossible to produce a birth certificate. Complainant thinks she is sixty-five, but produces no evidence in support of this view. I shall…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. TurnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
  2. Shields v. HuntNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alt v. KwiatekNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
  2. Bruten v. MillerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  3. Skovborg v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API