Legal Opinion
Bruten v. Miller
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 24, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
28 N.J. Super. 531 (1953)
101 A.2d 24
MARGARET BRUTEN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
GEORGE N. MILLER AND SARAH MILLER, HIS WIFE, BERNICE REVIS MILLER, ALLEGED TO BE THE DIVORCED WIFE OF GEORGE N. MILLER, AND CLARA MAE SLATON AND JOHN SLATON, HER HUSBAND, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided November 24, 1953.
Mr. John Henry Reiners, Jr., attorney for plaintiff.
Mr. Herman M. Bell, Jr., attorney for defendants.
HANEMAN, J.S.C.
Plaintiff herein seeks to establish her interest in a certain fund deposited by the Housing Authority of the City of Camden in this court, pursuant to R.S.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alt v. KwiatekNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
- Lloyd v. TurnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
- Bahr v. CooperNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- Spinning v. SpinningSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1887
- Tarrant v. CarrigNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- NJ Highway Authority v. J. & F. HOLDING CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- In Re FlaschNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- In re the Dower Interest of the Estate of WheatonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001