Hughes v. Warden
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT TG □ □□ □ FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND □□ □□ □ ANTHONY THOMAS HUGHES, a Petitioner, □ V. Civil Action No.: GJH-20-1071 WARDEN CASEY CAMPBELL, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Respondent filed a Limited Answer to the above-entitled Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus asserting that the petition must be dismissed because it is untimely. ECF No. 3. The Court granted Petitioner Anthony Thomas Hughes an opportunity to file a Response to address the timeliness of the Petition and discuss whether equitable tolling of the limitations period applies. Petitioner filed a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Rose v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.