Legal Opinion

In re Herman

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided September 18, 1944No. 91PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATWELL, District Judge.

On March 27, 1944, in the case of Billings v. Truesdell, 321 U.S. 542, 64 S.Ct. 737, the Supreme Court, in a carefully considered opinion, held that one is not inducted into the United States Army until he has taken the oath. The regulations made in pursuance of the Act of the Congress, as well as the precise wording of the Act itself, support that decision.

By Sec. 11 of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 54 Stat. 894, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 311, the “actual induction” is shown to be the administration of this oath. The War Department regulations in force…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Falbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Billings v. TruesdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Bowles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. United States v. ColluraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  5. United States ex rel. Russell v. LawrenceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maarten Crijns Derozario v. Commanding Officer, Armed Forces Examining and Induction Station and Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  2. United States Ex Rel. Norris v. NormanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
  3. Miller v. Commanding OfficerDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API