United States ex rel. Russell v. Lawrence
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the CourtYankwich, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
Two questions call for decision. The first is whether the process of induction was completed and the petitioner is in the Army. The second is whether, assuming that he is in the Army, the failure of Local Board No. 1, Coos County, Oregon, located at Marshfield, to classify him as a minister was an arbitrary and capricious act unsupported by substantial evidence.
In determining both issues, it is well to advert to certain general principles. The right to wage war is co-existent with the right of sovereignty. The war powers of the United States are plenary.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Falbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. MacIntoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Billings v. TruesdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Bowles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Lawrence v. Commanding Officer of McCook Army Air FieldDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
- In re HermanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1944
- Miller v. Commanding OfficerDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1944