Legal Opinion
Maarten Crijns Derozario v. Commanding Officer, Armed Forces Examining and Induction Station and Secretary of Defense
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 21, 1967No. 21623_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court for the Central District of California, denying appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court entertained the petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1964). This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (1964).
On August 9, 1966, a petition for a writ of habeas corpus was filed on behalf of the appellant Maarten Crijns de-Rozario, alleging that he was unlawfully “detained and restrained of his liberty” by the commanding officer of the Armed Forces Examining and Induction Station, 1033 South…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Wales v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States ex rel. Schonbrun v. OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Lanier Allison Ramer v. United States of America, Eugene Richard Church v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Crane v. HedrickDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1968
- Timothy Floyd Lewis v. Secretary, Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Commanding Officer, Armed ForcesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.