Legal Opinion

Economy Appliance Co. v. Fitzgerald Mfg. Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 1, 1928No. 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, District Judge.

Economy Appliance Company and Frederick W. Collier charge the defendant with infringement of claims 2, 3, 4, 5, and 9 of letters patent No. 1,358,932. The patent was issued to the plaintiff Collier as assignor to Eeonomy Appliance Company on November 16, 1920. The application was filed February 15,1917. The patentee has joined with his assignee in suing the alleged infringer.

Defendant does not seriously contest validity, but argues against a conclusion holding infringement, and asserts that the claims should be so limited as to exclude defendant’s structure.

The patent…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Naylor v. Alsop Process Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. General Electric Co. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  3. Permutit Co. v. Harvey Laundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  4. Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. KalleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1899
  5. Detroit Motor Appliance Co. v. BurkeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Small v. Heywood-Wakefield Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1936
  2. Hurd v. CoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1936
  3. Irving v. Kerlow Steel Flooring Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API