Legal Opinion

State v. Bennett

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 13, 1969No. 6926SC363PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

All of defendant’s purported exceptions and assignments of error are to the charge of the court. However, the portions thereof assigned as error are not set out in the assignments of error, and no exceptions appear with respect thereto except under the purported assignments of error. The portions of the charge to which defendant takes exception are not identified in the record by letters, parentheses, or in any other manner. These purported assignments of error are ineffective to challenge the correctness of the charge. Vail v. Smith, 1 N.C. App. 498, 162 S.E. 2d 78; State v. Dunn, 264 N.C.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Vail v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LarrimoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Yandle v. YandleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API