Legal Opinion

Vail v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 10, 1968No. 68SC126PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Defendant contends the court erred in failing to grant her motion for judgment on the referee’s report and in submitting issues to the jury. The referee’s report was filed on 11 January 1965. Plaintiffs filed exceptions thereto on 8 March 1965. The record is silent as to the date plaintiffs had notice of the filing of the report. Defendant’s motion for judgment on the report was filed on 18 May 1967 — more than 2 years after the exceptions to the report were filed.

Certain procedural requirements are to be followed in matters where a compulsory reference has been ordered so that a right to a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. StarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Green v. CastleburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  3. Bartlett v. HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Long v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Coburn v. Roanoke Land and Timber CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MelvinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Crown Coco, Inc. v. Red Fox Restaurant of Royalton, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API