Legal Opinion

State v. Hinchey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1892No. 627PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Gourt, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, C. J.

The respondent moves the court to strike from the transcript the alleged statement of facts, for the following reasons: (1) No notice of the settlement of such statement was ever served on the prosecuting attorney or tiled as required by the statute. ■( 2) Said statement of facts was signed and settled by the judge after he had lost jurisdiction to settle and certify the same. (3) The said statement of facts is not certified as required by law.

There is nothing in the record showing that any notice of settling the statement of facts was…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scholz v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  2. State v. SeatonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State v. GawithMontana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. State v. GundlachWashington Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API