Northwest Forest Resource Council v. Espy
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JACKSON, District Judge.
In two recent cases six federal justices and judges have written at length on the problem presented in this case, namely, the implications of the constraints placed by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (“FACA” or “the Act”), 5 U.S.CApp. 2 (1988), on the President’s ability to solicit and receive collective advice privately and without formality. 1 Them several opinions developed most of the research and reasoning that underlies this decision as well, and it need not, therefore, be reiterated here. Superficially characterized, however, their…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Public Citizen v. United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Public Citizen v. National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for FoodsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
- Seattle Audubon Society v. LyonsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1994
- American Forest Resource Council v. SheaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. AbrahamDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Heartwood, Inc. v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.