Legal Opinion

Garg v. People Ex Rel. State Bd. of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1997No. B093527PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

In this case of first impression, we hold that litigation expenses awarded to a taxpayer under Revenue and Taxation Code section 7156 1 are not subject to an offset by the state under Government Code sections 12419.4 2 and 12419.5 3 against taxes owed, or claimed to be owed, by the taxpayer. We conclude that a contrary rule would effectively nullify section 7156 and would thereby undermine an important mechanism for the enforcement of the citizen protections created by the Harris-Katz California Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights. (§ 7080 et seq.; hereafter the Taxpayers’ Bill of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Woosley v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Kruger v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Agnew v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Chen v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Lucent Technologies v. State Board of Equaliz.California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API