Legal Opinion

Langley v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 9, 1925PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarrows, J.

Action for negligence. Heard on exceptions to' refusal of the trial court to direct a verdict for the defendant, to grant a new trial after a $7,600 verdict for plaintiff and because of alleged error in admitting certain evidence over defendant’s objection.

Defendant conducts a large five and ten cent store on Westminster, Dorr anee and Fulton streets in Providence. There are eight entrances. The floor is of wood, the store well lighted, and the aisles are eight to ten feet wide. Several thousand people pass in and out of the store daily and the peak of the day’s business is reached at about…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Benedick v. PottsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  2. Norton v. HudnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Kipp v. F. W. Woolworth & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  4. Ginns v. C. T. Sherer Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Lanni v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Moore v. American Stores Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  3. S. H. Kress & Co. v. SelphCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Dawson v. Rhode Island Auditorium, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  5. Lyons v. LichOregon Supreme Court · 1933

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API