Legal Opinion

San Jacinto Oil Co. v. Culberson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1907No. 1676PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District, in an appeal from Tarrant County. The San Jacinto Oil Company and its receiver appealed from a judgment recovered by certain interveners in the receivership proceedings and on affirmance obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.

On the 16th day of January, 1903, in the District Court of Tarrant County the property of plaintiff in error, The San Jacinto Oil Company, was placed in the hands of George W. Armstrong, as receiver, tó be administered and distributed in payment of its debts. On the 7th day of March, 1903, a master in chancery was appointed, whose duties were defined in the order of appointment. He was directed, among other things, to ascertain- and report all claims and demands against the company, the priority and validity of the same; to examine and report upon all interventions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dwyer v. KalteyerTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Whitehead v. PerieTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Kempner v. Galveston CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. McCormick v. JesterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Alamo Title Company v. San Antonio Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Arlington Heights Realty Co. v. Citizens' Ry. & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Granger v. Folk, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1996
  5. Cogdell v. Fort Worth National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API