Lackey v. Sacoolas
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Musmanno,
William T. Lackey and Blanch R. Lackey, his wife, members of the colored race, brought an action in equity to restrain Nicholas Sacoolas, doing business as Maple Grove Amusement Park and Swimming Pool, in Lancaster County, from denying to the Lackeys and other persons the privileges of the Maple Grove Swimming Pool because of race, creed or color, in violation of the Act of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, §654 (18 P.S. §4654). At the hearing on the motion for. a preliminary injunction, it developed that an organization known as the Maple Grove Recreation Association…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Everett v. HarronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Seidel v. GoldsmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- Reproductive Health Services, Inc. v. LeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Williams v. Rescue Fire CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1966
- Rupel v. BluesteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- State v. NeilCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.