Seidel v. Goldsmith
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
This is an appeal from a decree awarding a preliminary injunction which restrained the defendant from engaging in the malt extract and bottling business within a certain radius in the City of Philadelphia, contrary to the provisions of a contract of sale between the parties.
Following the practice of the Supreme Court (Howard v. Goodnough, 292 Pa. 547; Kaufman v. Philadelphia, 293 Pa. 270) "we will look only to see if there ■were any apparently reasonable grounds for the action of the court below, and will not consider the merits of the case or further pass upon the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Howard v. GoodnoughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Stefanich v. Beaver FallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Kaufman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lackey v. SacoolasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963