Legal Opinion

Seidel v. Goldsmith

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1929No. Appeal 291PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This is an appeal from a decree awarding a preliminary injunction which restrained the defendant from engaging in the malt extract and bottling business within a certain radius in the City of Philadelphia, contrary to the provisions of a contract of sale between the parties.

Following the practice of the Supreme Court (Howard v. Goodnough, 292 Pa. 547; Kaufman v. Philadelphia, 293 Pa. 270) "we will look only to see if there ■were any apparently reasonable grounds for the action of the court below, and will not consider the merits of the case or further pass upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Howard v. GoodnoughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Stefanich v. Beaver FallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Kaufman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lackey v. SacoolasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API