Legal Opinion

Van Allen v. Circle K Corp.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 22, 1972No. 71-2535 FWPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION THAT THIS ACTION BE MAINTAINED AS A CLASS ACTION

WHELAN, District Judge.

In this action plaintiffs have made a motion that this action be maintained as a class action pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 23(c)(1). The defendant opposes such motion.

The named plaintiffs purport to represent different classes although plaintiffs’ counsel contends there is only one class. Plaintiff Van Allen purports to represent a class comprised of all persons whose franchise agreements with defendant have terminated; plaintiff Haardt purports to represent a class comprised of all persons who, although…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chicken Delight, Inc. v. George B. Harris, District Judge, Harvey S. Siegel, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Broussard v. Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  2. Robertson v. National Basketball AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  3. Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Al Barnett & Son, Inc. v. Outboard Marine Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1974
  5. AAMCO Automatic Transmissions, Inc. v. TayloeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API