Legal Opinion
State v. Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 15, 1946No. 34,000PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Magney, Justice.
Defendant was arraigned on the following information:
“I, Harold C. Lindgren, County Attorney * * * hereby inform the court that * * * at the city of Blue Earth * * * Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Company, a corporation * * * engaged in the business of buying farm produce, including poultry, with its principal place of business at Wells, Minnesota, did wilfully, wrongfully and unlawfully, in violation of Section 6248-3, Mason’s Minnesota Statutes, Supplement 1940, Minnesota Statutes 1941, Section 17.15, discriminate between different sections, localities, communities, cities and…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215, International Ass'n of Fire FightersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- May's Drug Stores, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- State v. OmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Donathan v. McMinn CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.